3 thoughts on “510180 180ETF Fund was split, and my stock was transferred to more than 3,000 shares of more than 1W shares. The cost price was high. Why is the total value less?”
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Friends, first of all, the picture you posted should be the details of your stock software. The software used by various securities firms is actually several mainstream software, adding a logo of a brokerage firm. They show errors in the cost of holding shareholding, especially after the multiple dividends, shares changes (shares, shares, and split) formed by long -term shareholding, the "cost price" given , So this value is best calculated by yourself. Due to the error of the value of "cost price", the "realization of profit and loss", "floating profit and loss", and "profit and loss ratio" calculated later are all wrong. The number of these numbers in you here is the opposite, and it is really outrageous.
In the end of 180ETF at the end of last year, the fund shares merged at 4: 1 (note that it is merged, not split, you can check the fund's announcement
), that is, the share of four old fund shares will be changed to change With a new fund share, the corresponding net value of each fund has also become four times the original. This requires a specific procedure to achieve it, so you see a "custody transfer" on December 20, 13th. This is just a procedure. You don't need to care about it at all, without any operation. He just makes the fund share you hold into one -quarter, but the net value per net value is four times the original. In fact, the total market value has not changed at all, and there is no cash. It's gone. "
The because your total market value of the fund has not changed at all, your loss has not changed. Because the number of stocks is only one -quarter of the original, the corresponding "cost price" should be increased by four times. But remind you that your real cost price may not be the previous Qimao and Jiu Cheng 4. After checking it, three reds of red after 180ETF09, the cost price should be lower than the purchase price.
510180 Hua'an Index Fund merged the fund share in December 2013. The share of the fund's share was merged into 1 copy, that is, the price increased by 4 times, and the number became 25%of the original. It is not matched with the Shanghai Stock Exchange 180 Index (000010).
It detailed information can be checked in F10 or went to Hua'an Fund's website to check the announcement.
How long does it take to come back to think about this problem at three o'clock? 27